• 首页
  • 关于杂志
  • 期刊荣誉
  • 投稿指南
    投稿指南
  • 征稿启事
    征稿启事1
    征稿启事2
    征稿启事3
    征稿启事5
    征稿启事4
    征稿启事6
  • 招标公告
    招标公告1
    招标公告2
    招标公告3
    招标公告4
    招标公告5
    招标公告6
    招标公告7
    招标公告8
    招标公告9
    招标公告10
    招标公告11
    招标公告12
    招标公告13
    招标公告14
    招标公告15
    招标公告16
    招标公告17
    招标公告18
    招标公告19
    招标公告20
    招标公告21
    招标公告22
    招标公告23
    招标公告24
    招标公告25
    招标公告26
    招标公告27
    招标公告28
    招标公告29
    招标公告30
    招标公告31
    招标公告32
    招标公告33
    招标公告34
    招标公告35
    招标公告36
    招标公告37
    招标公告38
    招标公告39
    招标公告40
    招标公告41
    招标公告42
    招标公告43
    招标公告44
    招标公告45
    招标公告46
    招标公告47
    招标公告48
    招标公告49
    招标公告50
    招标公告51
    招标公告52
    招标公告53
    招标公告54
    招标公告55
    招标公告56
    招标公告57
    招标公告58
    招标公告59
    招标公告60
    招标公告61
    招标公告62
    招标公告63
    招标公告64
    招标公告65
    招标公告66
    招标公告67
    招标公告68
    招标公告69
    招标公告70
    招标公告71
    招标公告72
    招标公告73
    招标公告74
    招标公告75
    招标公告76
    招标公告77
  • 招标公告.
    招标公告1
    招标公告2
    招标公告3
    招标公告4
    招标公告5
    招标公告6
  • 招聘启事
    招聘公告1
    招聘公告2
    招聘公告3
  • 公示
    公开招聘拟聘人员公示
    中标结果公示1
    中标结果公示2
    中标结果公示3
    中标结果公示4
    中标结果公示5
    中标结果公示6
  • 在线留言
引用本文:
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】   【查看/发表评论】  【下载PDF阅读器】  【关闭】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 125次   下载 26次 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
字体:加大+|默认|缩小-
科技金融的风险分担机制与治理路径 ——基于四类工具的比较分析
宁小花1,邓珂21,2
1.(1.中央财经大学绩效管理研究中心,北京 100081;2.中央财经大学金融学院,北京 102206)
摘要:
摘要:面向关键核心技术攻关,科技金融支持的关键不在于资金供给,而在于高不确定性项目如何被允许失败。以“风险识别-风险定价-损失承受-失败处置”为框架,比较政府引导基金、政策性或商业性担保、科技保险与投贷联动的激励结构及外溢通道,并界定适用边界。结果显示:基金优势在投后治理与退出再循环,失灵于行政化偏好与退出受阻;担保擅长信用桥接,但分险与费率纪律弱化易固化软预算;保险可分摊尾部风险,却受制于可保性数据与理赔摩擦;投贷联动可改善风险收益匹配,但在资本约束与估值波动下可能放大顺周期共振。因此,应通过统一项目台账与分层损失顺序,划清财政金融边界,强化退出与压力测试,并将外溢成本与失败复盘纳入绩效约束,从而优化科技金融的风险分担体系。
关键词:  关键词:科技金融;风险分担;政府引导基金;担保;保险
DOI:
分类号:F832.1
基金项目:基金项目:北京市教育科学“十四五”规划2023年度青年专项课题“新文科建设背景下数字赋能的财经类拔尖创新人才‘贯通-融合’培养模式研究”(CDCA23134)。
Performance Governance Driving Risk Sharing in Technology Finance——A Comparative Analysis of Four Financial Instruments
NING Xiao-hua1,DENG Ke21,2
1.(1.Development Planning Department,Central University of Finance and Economics1;2.School of Finance,Central University of Finance and Economics)
Abstract:
Abstract:In addressing key technological breakthroughs,the critical role of technology finance lies not in the supply of funds,but in how high-uncertainty projects are allowed to fail.This paper frames the issue around risk identification,risk pricing,loss absorption,and failure resolution,comparing the incentive structures and spillover channels of government guidance funds,policy/commercial guarantees,technology insurance,and the loan-equity linkage mechanism,while also defining their applicable boundaries.The findings reveal that funds excel in post-investment governance and exit recycling but are hindered by bureaucratic preferences and blocked exits;guarantees are effective in bridging credit but weaken risk-sharing and fee discipline,leading to entrenched soft budgets;insurance can disperse tail risks but is limited by insurability data and claims friction;loan-equity linkage improves the risk-return matching,but under capital constraints and valuation fluctuations,it may amplify pro-cyclical resonance.Policy implications suggest the need for unified project ledgers and hierarchical loss sequencing,clear delineation between fiscal and financial boundaries,enhanced exit mechanisms and stress testing,and the integration of spillover costs and failure reviews into performance constraints.
Key words:  Key words:Technology Finance;Government Guidance Funds;Guarantees;Insurance;Loan-equity Linkage
您是本站第  5446446  位访问者!
版权所有:当代金融研究
主办单位:西南大学    重庆日报报业集团
地址:重庆市两江新区同茂大道416号重庆新闻传媒大厦1幢13楼1313室    邮政编码:401120
电话:023-67677131   电子邮箱:ddjryjbjb@163.com
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司

渝公网安备 50011202500956号